Soon we will see our young people on the streets changing "death to Christians" as they are now changing "death to Jews" and THAT is what statements like the one referenced in this interview is all about. They are setting the stage.

Expand full comment
Nov 7, 2023Liked by Alex Newman

“Individuals have no right to rear their biological children, nor do they have any interests weighty enough to justify a right to rear children generally,” writes Kianpour, a PhD candidate in philosophy.

Yes, the philosophy of evil. And "no right?" He has no right to be loose in a free society. Head on off to North Korea, where you'd be happier, you fasco-Marxiswt Kianpour

Expand full comment
Nov 7, 2023Liked by Alex Newman

BTW if you want to find someone taking this garbage on with COURAGE, check out Dr. Paul Cameron's Family Research Inst, https://www.familyresearchinst.org/ out of Colorado Springs. Cameron did his PhD at Univ of Colorado Boulder (they would never let him graduate today!), and is both sharp and courageous. We try to send him a few bucks when we can. Good man, one of the few standing up to the darkness today. At least check his website out.

Expand full comment
Nov 7, 2023Liked by Alex Newman

Actually, what should be licensed is the jail... where this idiot faux academic should be.

Expand full comment

Look at this. Look at how they controlled Tucker Carlson, because... kids!! @2:56 https://rumble.com/v3ttqej-tucker-carlson-on-leaving-fox-news-changing-views-and-whats-next.html

Expand full comment

Good luck with that; more evidence that the Government wants to play God!!

Expand full comment

Eugenics is alive and likely its advocates in the sycophant administration class would never have been born had these anti human policies been in place. The best example is Ludwig Van Beethoven. His mother, single mother of six, who had syphillis, and was considered having 'loose morals' would never have been allowed to gift the world the musical genius her son became. Not saying this is a great example of family dynamics but that we never know who will be gifted as a human being.

Expand full comment

The “Great Collapse of Society”

“The Frankfurt School and “Critical Theory”

The “Frankfurt School,” or Institute for Social Research, was set up by a group of Marxist intellectuals in Germany in 1923, affiliated to the University of Frankfurt and independently of the Communist Party, which has been influential in the development of Marxist theory ever since.

The Frankfurt School believed that as long as an individual had the belief – or even the hope of belief – that his divine gift of reason could solve the problems facing society, then that society would never reach the state of hopelessness and alienation that they considered necessary to provoke socialist revolution. Their task, therefore, was as swiftly as possible to undermine the Judeo-Christian legacy. To do this they called for the most negative destructive criticism possible of every sphere of life which would be designed to de-stabilize society and bring down what they saw as the ‘oppressive’ order. Their policies, they hoped, would spread like a virus—‘continuing the work of the Western Marxists by other means’ as one of their members noted.

To further advance their ‘quiet’ incremental cultural revolution (Fabian Socialism) – but giving us no ideas about their plans for the future – the School recommended (among other things):

Divide and Conquer.

The oppressed and their oppressors.

1. The creation of racism offenses.

2. Continual change to create confusion.

3. The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children.

4. The undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority.

5. Huge immigration to destroy identity.

6. The promotion of excessive drinking/drug abuse.

7. Emptying of churches.

8. An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime.

9. Dependency on the state or state benefits.

10. Control and dumbing down of media.

11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family.

One of the main ideas of the Frankfurt School was to exploit Freud’s idea of ‘pan-sexualism’ – the search for pleasure, the exploitation of the differences between the sexes, the overthrowing of traditional relationships between men and women. To further their aims they would:

• attack the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of father and mother, and wrest away from families their rights as primary educators of their children.

• abolish differences in the education of boys and girls

• abolish all forms of male dominance – hence the presence of women in the armed forces

• declare women to be an ‘oppressed class’ and men as ‘oppressors.’


Expand full comment

While I understand the desire of Ms Ells in arguing against the totalitarian ideas of a moron like this guy, subsidized by parents who raised their own children (i.e. if he’d had his way, no one would have heard of him...), I find no useful purpose in legitimizing his views by doing so.

Tangentially, but of relevance, nearly everyone today fails to grasp that the West rose by killing its enemies. This is how kingdoms were forged, new lands and their resources brought into play, how civilization spread. Charlemagne - largely responsible for the creation of what we call Western Europe today - annually warred on the Saxons, as just one example; Manifest Destiny, another. Civilization has been in retreat since 1945, when it was decided NOT killing our enemies was somehow more civilized. Look around.

This idiot Kianpour should be dropped in a shallow grave, covered over and forgotten about. The idea he is NOT an enemy of civilization is childish. But we’ve got children running the show today …

Expand full comment

Sorry...Im too stupid to talk to you. You are too high above me.

I tried to be congenial and complimentary..

end of conversation!!

Expand full comment

Gee, what could possibly go wrong with that? Politics?

And what is the consequence of an unlicensed pregnancy? China has FORCED ABORTIONS for that. Even for full term babies.

Expand full comment

Ah, another democrat dystopian state of being!

Expand full comment

Only if we can license politicians and have nationwide recall laws that provide for speedy removal from office.

Expand full comment

If you like it when ppl dont want to converse with you...Why the fuk do you post stuff.

U Goof. If U post stuff ppl r gonna comment.

and if they comment...U prefer ...that they DONT.

U R 1 Goofy sum bitch!

Expand full comment