Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Prof. Fred Nazar's avatar

It's deliberate.

White privilege

Caveat: being created in the image and likeness of God (Gn 1:26-27), all humans share the same divine dignity. Under God, no race is higher or better than another. The only thing that counts on judgement day, is how much each person loved God and neighbor in each minute. God wants all men from all peoples to be saved (Is 2:1-5; Rev 5:9; Ps 2:8). Skin pigment has zero value in face of eternal bliss or damnation, yet racial hate, as any hate, is a turnpike to hell. There’s no room for hatred in heaven. Heaven is being with God. God is perfect love (1 Jn 4:7-12). He’s incompatible with the slightest hate (desire of evil to others, means being enchained to evil, Satan).

White privilege is “an invisible package of unearned assets that I can count on cashing in each day, but about which I was “meant” to remain oblivious. White privilege is like an invisible weightless knapsack of special provisions, maps, passports, codebooks, visas, clothes, tools , and blank checks” (McIntosh, 1988).

It assumes the privilege is undeserved without any proof. Proving that it is deserved, indirectly means that other races fairly deserve less, thus, the proof becomes racist in itself. Catch 22. It’s a circular argument. The only way to prove its falsity is that Asians have thrived in the US in only 1 generation, while non-whites didn’t. This shows that there’s no privilege and no barrier, except hard work and a frugal living!

Median weekly earnings of full-time wage and salary workers

by sex, race, and ethnicity, U.S., 2009.[

http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpswom2009.pdf

Sidenote: the earnings show a difference with women because it doesn’t take into account total hours worked (they deliberately mix full-time wage with hourly salaries!). The glass ceiling myth is the hours/ability ceiling!

Asians have the highest full time earnings: why isn’t anybody speaking of Asian privilege? Because this is a war on whites, especially, male.

The same crazy argument could turn into anti-judaism, considering the percentage of Jews in the top income tier. Or, for that sake, anti-armenians, anti-turks, etc., since those peoples also thrive in the US above average whites and non-whites.

The so called “white-trash” can’t be used as counter-argument. Poor whites proove that poverty doesn’t discriminate the white race and that family support is essential to the thriving of all children: there’s never equality of opportunity if you lack a father. Instead of asking the skin color, social researchers should focus on the destruction of the family.

Privilege ideology tries to avoid that rebuttal by an irrational explanation which is actually a counter argument: “Non-whites who have are of a higher social class than whites would also receive different treatment. Sullivan states that the revised concept of ‘white class privilege’ must be used intersectionally—that is, privilege must be considered interacting with class, gender, national, and other social experiences. Sure, lower-class whites may be treated differently than higher-class blacks in certain contexts, but this does not mean that the lower-class white has ‘more privilege’ than the upper-class black. This shows that we should not assume that lower-class whites have the same kinds of privilege conferred by society as middle- and upper-class whites.” 1

Their conclusion: if a non-white gets rich, he deserves it, but if a white works hard to get rich, it is an unearned privilege, and vice-versa, a lazy non-white doesn’t deserve to be poor because he is underprivileged, while a working white, does deserve poverty because he still has the privilege of being a white poor !!!

Also, this ideology assumes that all whites are racists, even subconsciously: conveniently, that can never be disproven! Even if the white is a relative, friend or fiancée, any white is presumed a subconscious biggot. The most unbelievable case happened in Las Vegas where a student with African ascent was classified as a white-privileged black, just because one of his parents was white, and was sanctioned by the school for questioning Critical race theory2, stating that being black he was presumed to be a racist against other blacks.

White privilege is presumed even in countries without whites: the privilege belongs to the European and North American countries exploiting the poor nation.

The Floyd incident was used to funnel Black Live Matters with money from Soros. The ultimate goal? installing a system of racism against whites. White privilege ideology means inequality against whites in all positions: education, jobs, government, political parties. When non-whites are given preference based on race and not talent/results, it’s the reverse of affirmative action: de-firmative action to push non-white supremacism.

This destroys the whole concept of a merit system, irrespective of skin. When merit is not fairly recognized, people get disheartened and the whole system becomes less productive making everyone poorer. But the worst part of the ideology is that it creates resentment for nothing: all the intersectionality self-victimized identities can blame their situation not on their parents, lack of self-effort or bad luck, but on the oppression of white supremacism. Every white is an enemy just because of skin.

There’s also white guilt: feeling guilty just because of skin. People can’t even imagine how many whites refrain from using white skin colored icons in WhatsApp or other chats, because of fear being accused of racism or white pride.

The full PLAN exposed:

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-plan-revealed

16 laws we need to exit Prison Planet

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/laws-to-exit-planet-prison

Expand full comment
Elsa's avatar

Yes, horrible, that controlled demolition

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts